A construction loan funds hard and soft costs against a draw schedule and is taken out by permanent debt at stabilization. A tax credit bridge advances against future tax-credit equity pay-ins and is taken out by those equity contributions, not by perm debt. The two coexist on most LIHTC and HTC deals.
Construction loan vs. tax credit bridge, sources, uses, and take-out timing
Tax credit programs change with IRS, Treasury, NPS, and CDFI Fund guidance. This page is sponsor-POV process commentary, not tax or legal advice. Engage tax counsel and a tax-credit syndicator for every transaction before relying on the mechanics described.
Construction loan basics: a senior secured loan funded against a defined draw schedule that follows hard and soft costs. Typical structure: 60% to 80% LTC sizing, 12-to-36-month term, interest reserve to cover construction-period interest, completion guaranty from the sponsor, take-out by permanent debt or sale at stabilization.
Tax credit bridge basics: a senior or junior loan secured by future tax-credit equity contributions. Sized to the gap between cumulative construction outflows and cumulative equity pay-ins at peak working-capital need. Take-out by the syndicator's funded equity tranches, not by perm debt.
Why both exist on LIHTC deals: a typical 9% LIHTC project has multiple capital sources funding asynchronously. Construction loan funds hard costs; LIHTC equity funds tranched at lease-up and 8609; deferred developer fee bridges some of the gap; soft funding (HOME, AHTF, state grants) lands at various stages. The tax credit bridge fills the residual timing gap.
Coordination at closing: both loans typically close concurrently with all of the equity sources and soft funding in a single coordinated closing event. The intercreditor agreement governs cash flow priority, typically construction loan first on collateral, tax credit bridge subordinated, with carve-outs making sure equity pay-ins flow first to retire the bridge.
Take-out sequencing: a typical LIHTC deal: (a) construction loan retires at COO from permanent debt (HUD 223(f), agency, or bank perm); (b) tax credit bridge retires from equity pay-ins as syndicator funds tranches; (c) some bridges remain outstanding through 8609 issuance and final equity true-up.
Sponsor playbook: model the construction loan and tax credit bridge as parallel tracks, not stacked layers. Each has different sizing, pricing, and take-out logic. The placement firm coordinates both lender comparisons simultaneously to align term sheets, intercreditor structure, and closing timeline.
Sources
- Section 221(d)(4), Multifamily New Construction & Substantial Rehabilitation · U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development · current
- Section 223(f): Refinance or Acquisition of Existing Multifamily · U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development · current
- Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (IRC §42) · U.S. Internal Revenue Service · current
