1. Home
  2. Answers
  3. Underwriting
  4. How does cooling design (air vs. evaporative vs. liquid) affect data center financing?

How does cooling design (air vs. evaporative vs. liquid) affect data center financing?

Short answer

Air cooling is cheapest per MW but caps at roughly 30 kW per rack . Evaporative cooling adds capex and water consumption but supports higher densities. Liquid cooling (direct-to-chip or immersion) is the most expensive per MW but required for AI workloads above 50 kW per rack. Lenders price obsolescence risk on air-only designs.

Why cooling architecture is now a credit variable

Per EPRI research on data center electricity, the shift toward AI training workloads has driven rack densities from a 2010s norm of 5 to 10 kW per rack to a 2025 design point of 30 to 100 kW per rack. Air cooling becomes infeasible above roughly 30 kW per rack, and evaporative or liquid cooling becomes a required architecture for high-density AI deployments.

Lenders treat cooling architecture as a forward-looking obsolescence risk. A facility designed in 2020 for 10 kW per rack air cooling is structurally less attractive to a 2026 AI-focused tenant than a facility designed for liquid cooling at 50 kW per rack. The financing community has begun to discount older air-cooled facilities on exit cap rate and on residual lease assumptions.

Sources

  1. Powering Intelligence: Analyzing Artificial Intelligence and Data Center Use of Electricity · Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) · current
  2. Better Buildings Data Center Accelerator and Challenge · U.S. Department of Energy · current
Start a Conversation

Have a financing need? Let’s talk.